Africa: CSOs accuse FAO of declaring war on farmers

http://www.grain.org/go/fao-en

(Embargoed until Wednesday 16 June, 12.00 h. in Rome)

PRESS RELEASE

CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS ACCUSE FAO OF FAVOURING MONSANTO AND PUSHING
TRANSGENIC CROPS

"FAO declares war on farmers, not on hunger"

Through an open letter delivered today in Rome, hundreds of civil society
organisations from across the world denounce that a recent report by FAO
(the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation) is a disgraceful public
relations tool for the genetic engineering industry

Rome, 16 June 2004.

The FAO report ("Agricultural biotechnology: meeting the needs of the
poor?") was publicly presented on the 17th of May, and in the space of a
few weeks more than 650 civil society organisations and 800 individuals
from 120 countries have drafted and supported this open letter which
strongly condemns its bias against the poor, against the environment and
against food production in general. Amongst them are many peasant
organisations, social movements and scientists.

The 200-plus page document struggles to appear neutral, but is highly
biased and ignores available evidence of the adverse ecological,
economic, and health impacts of genetically engineered crops.

The civil society organisations denounce that, although the FAO report
does mention that genetic engineering is dominated by corporations, it
overlooks the fact that only one company - Monsanto - controls over 90%
of the total world area sown to transgenic seeds. Not surprisingly, the
report has been received enthusiastically by the industry and other
groups that push this technology with the claim that it will solve the
world hunger problem.

In a radical departure from a position adopted in the year 2000, with
this report the FAO now seems to support the so called 'Terminator
technology' which produces sterile seeds that stop farmers from saving
and re-using seeds from previous harvests. Proponents of GM crops,
including FAO in its report, have also proclaimed that genetic
engineering will reduce the use of chemical pesticides and herbicides by
farmers, and therefore would be beneficial for human health and the
environment. However, recent studies within the US itself contradict this
claim with evidence showing that there is a substantial increase in the
use of herbicides on herbicide-resistant crops over the past three years.
Dr. Charles Benbrook of the Northwest Science and Environmental Policy
Center found that for many farmers planting herbicide-tolerant crops, the
amount of herbicides sprayed has increased incrementally in order to keep
up with tougher weeds that evolved and the emergence of resistance in
certain weed populations.

"We believe that FAO has broken its commitment to civil society and
peasants' organizations to consult on issues of common concern", the open
letter states. It continues: "Farmers and civil society organizations
will meet and consult in the coming months to determine what further
actions should be taken regarding FAO and the negative repercussions of
this report."

The open setter was delivered today in the headquarters of the
organisation in Rome, and constitutes the start of a process in which
civil society organisations will reconsider their relation with the FAO
in the future. "For those of us in civil society organisations and social
movements that considered the FAO as an institution that we could relate
to and a forum to debate these issues and possibly move forward, this is
a tremendous setback", states the letter. "The report turns FAO away from
food sovereignty and the real needs of the world's farmers, and is a stab
in the back to the farmers and the rural poor FAO is meant to support."

Contrary to what FAO proposes, genetically engineered crops don't help
fighting hunger in the world. The letter clarifies: "History demonstrates
that structural changes in access to land, food, and political power -
combined with robust, ecological technologies via farmer-led research -
reduce hunger and poverty. The 'gene revolution' promises to take us in
the opposite direction."

Genetic contamination is polluting the very heart of the world's centres
of crop diversity. But FAO brushes aside this tragedy with hardly a
comment. Yet, for the very cultures that created agriculture this is an
aggression against their life, against the crops they created and
nurture, and against their food sovereignty.

The organisations qualify the document as "highly biased", and being
disgraceful public relations tool for the genetic engineering industry
and for those countries that seek to export this technology.

At the same time, notes the open letter, the report "sadly, raises
serious questions about the independence and intellectual integrity of an
important United Nations agency."

"It is unacceptable that FAO endorses the need for intellectual property
for corporations. This amounts to FAO support for corporate biopiracy
since the genetic resources that corporations seek to patent result from
the collective breeding work of farmers over thousands of years", the
letter notes.

For additional information:

+ Over 650 organisations and 800 individuals from across the world sign
on to an open setter to FAO. The full text of the open letter, and a list
of those who have signed onto it, can be downloaded from:
http://www.grain.org/ , see also http://[email protected] for Open Letter
to FAO.

+ The FAO press release about its report, and the report itself can be
found at: http://www.fao.org/newsroom/en/news/2004/41714/index.html

+ Contact at Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific:
Sarojeni V. Rengam, PAN AP, Tel: (+604) 657 0271.
Email: [email protected], [email protected],
Hand Phone: (+60) 16 478 9545